Web Survey Bibliography
Title A Respondent Classification Scheme for Online Sample Methodologies
Author Courtright, M.
Source CASRO Panel Conference, 2009
Year 2009
Access date 11.06.2009
Abstract
Are young participants more likely to have data quality issues? How are less-frequent survey-takers different from more active participants? What do the “worst offender respondents” look like? What do the best respondents have in common? Researchers will walk away with a better understanding of the unique respondent groups that make up a classic data set, and what each groups means to the data.
Access/Direct link
Homepage (abstract)
Year of publication2009
Bibliographic typeConferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Web survey bibliography - CASRO Panel Conference, 2009 (10)
- Slider Scales in Online Surveys; 2009; Cape, P. J.
- Panel Discussion: Digital Fingerprinting: An Online Quality Solution and Its Implications; 2009; Smith, R., Chadwick, S., Davis, H., Berlin, D. L., Zalis, S.
- A Place for Mobile Communication and Mobile Surveying in Online Research; 2009; Luth, L.
- The Survey “Burden Factor”—How Important is Respondent’s Perception of Survey...; 2009; Drolet, J., Butler, A., Stevens, C.
- The Opportunity for Flash Scales in Online Surveys; 2009; Cape, P. J.
- Beyond ‘Trapping’ the Undesirable Panelist-The Use of Red Herrings to Reduce Satisficing...; 2009; Baker-Prewitt, J., Miller, J.
- Panel Discussion: Industry Sustainability In Light Of Recent Quality Initiatives; 2009; Pearson, C., Shapero, D., Umeh, K., Boen, D.
- Late Responders—Does Their Absence Affect the Findings of Fast Turnaround Surveys, or Not; 2009; Ambrose, D., Ripley, G.
- A Respondent Classification Scheme for Online Sample Methodologies; 2009; Courtright, M.
- Compensation Structure of Panels; 2009; Carlin, C., Billingsley, S.